StationRipper Forums : streamripper 1.61 is up http://www.stationripper.com/forum/ Copyright (c) 2006-2013 Web Wiz Forums - All Rights Reserved. Wed, 22 May 2013 05:48:25 +0000 Mon, 04 Oct 2004 23:31:12 +0000 http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss Web Wiz Forums 10.15 360 www.stationripper.com/forum/RSS_post_feed.asp?TID=609 <![CDATA[StationRipper Forums]]> http://www.stationripper.com/forum/forum_images/web_wiz_forums_black.png http://www.stationripper.com/forum/ <![CDATA[streamripper 1.61 is up : Hi. Yes, this is true. Try...]]> http://www.stationripper.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=609&PID=2751&title=streamripper-161-is-up#2751 Author: gregsharp
Subject: 609
Posted: 04 October 2004 at 11:31pm


Hi. Yes, this is true. Try changing ripstream_rip() from this:

ret = rip_manager_start_track(m_no_meta_name, m_track_count);

to this:

ret = rip_manager_start_track(m_current_track, m_track_count);

I fixed it in streamripper some time after 1.61.

Greg
]]> Mon, 04 Oct 2004 23:31:12 +0000 http://www.stationripper.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=609&PID=2751&title=streamripper-161-is-up#2751 <![CDATA[streamripper 1.61 is up : Hi Greg, http://www.ratajik....]]> http://www.stationripper.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=609&PID=2744&title=streamripper-161-is-up#2744 Author: gratajik
Subject: 609
Posted: 04 October 2004 at 6:36pm

Hi Greg,

http://www.ratajik.com/StationRipper/forum/forum_posts.asp?T ID=737&TPN=1

Afer playing with this a bit, it appears that the FIRST track name isn't getting used correctly.  I actually debugged in enough to see that, in like ripstream_rip(), the name IS there, but it's not getting used.  I'm not that familar with that part of the code... any idea what's up?

I don't know if it's always done this, as before the first song would never be "complete", or the station plays a short promo before playing the current song, so the user would never see this.  But the new version copies incomplete, so it would be nice to have the correct song name :)

If I have time I'll debug into this some more - let me know if you have any ideas.

Thanks,

-Greg

]]> Mon, 04 Oct 2004 18:36:53 +0000 http://www.stationripper.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=609&PID=2744&title=streamripper-161-is-up#2744 <![CDATA[streamripper 1.61 is up : Yeah. Annoying. Wonder what&#039;s...]]> http://www.stationripper.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=609&PID=2549&title=streamripper-161-is-up#2549 Author: gratajik
Subject: 609
Posted: 17 September 2004 at 7:22pm

Yeah.  Annoying.  Wonder what's up? A lot of stations are doing this.

Oh well.  No biggy, the version I'm putting out tonight will deal with this.  Nice actually, in that it will just start at the first and go until the end or it finds one it can rip.  User doesn't see anything unless it fails.

-Greg

]]> Fri, 17 Sep 2004 19:22:03 +0000 http://www.stationripper.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=609&PID=2549&title=streamripper-161-is-up#2549 <![CDATA[streamripper 1.61 is up : Hmm, very interesting. Here is...]]> http://www.stationripper.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=609&PID=2548&title=streamripper-161-is-up#2548 Author: gregsharp
Subject: 609
Posted: 17 September 2004 at 7:18pm

Hmm, very interesting. Here is the http header for number #4 (bold #2):

HTTP/1.0 302 Found
Content-type:text/html
Location: http://64.236.34.196:80/stream/1040

The 302 means "redirection". Streamripper should handle this, and make a second try with URL http://64.236.34.196:80/stream/1040.

Because of the change to socklib the redirection doesn't work (although for this stream, the redirection wouldn't have worked anyway, just that the error would have been different). There is another problem with my socklib change, which is live365 streams. They don't have an "icy" or "ice" field.

Some additional information, I found out why some http headers have icy information after the "\r\n\r\n". This happens with certain flavors of proxy servers. The proxy interprets the headers, and the ones which are unknown get moved to the data portion (i learned about this on the xmms forums).

Concerning the pls file, I had always assumed (i don't know why) that the (2075/18249) means that the stream has room for 18249 listeners and 2075 are being served.
]]> Fri, 17 Sep 2004 19:18:40 +0000 http://www.stationripper.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=609&PID=2548&title=streamripper-161-is-up#2548 <![CDATA[streamripper 1.61 is up : Well, this is interesting. The...]]> http://www.stationripper.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=609&PID=2547&title=streamripper-161-is-up#2547 Author: gratajik
Subject: 609
Posted: 17 September 2004 at 5:51pm

Well, this is interesting.

The way the URL to rip changed in this version (in StationRipper).  It APPEARS that some of the URL's on some of these stations are invalid.  If I run the old console against the URL the new one is getting, it also gets the error.

Example:

The 80's channel

[playlist]
numberofentries=4
File1=http://64.236.34.196:80/stream/1040
Title1=(#1 - 1/9584) CLUB 977 The 80s Channel (HIGH BANDWIDTH)
Length1=-1
File2=http://64.236.34.4:80/stream/1040
Title2=(#2 - 2075/18249) CLUB 977 The 80s Channel (HIGH BANDWIDTH)
Length2=-1
File3=http://64.236.34.67:80/stream/1040
Title3=(#3 - 3243/14770) CLUB 977 The 80s Channel (HIGH BANDWIDTH)
Length3=-1
File4=http://205.188.234.66:8010
Title4=(#4 - 10/10) CLUB 977 The 80s Channel (HIGH BANDWIDTH)
Length4=-1
Version=2

The first bold one I get a "not Found".  The second I get a  no header error.  The others work.

I can roll with this - When the user tries to rip, I'll just start at the first and go through until one works. Not fun, not sure what's up...

If I run in WinAmp, I get the same results.  But it works from the main PLS file.  Sooo.. does it just also go through them, or does it always pick #2 or something?

I'll let you know what I find, but ATM it looks like the console is doing what it should :)

-Greg

]]> Fri, 17 Sep 2004 17:51:56 +0000 http://www.stationripper.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=609&PID=2547&title=streamripper-161-is-up#2547 <![CDATA[streamripper 1.61 is up : By the way, I think I can explain...]]> http://www.stationripper.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=609&PID=2546&title=streamripper-161-is-up#2546 Author: gregsharp
Subject: 609
Posted: 17 September 2004 at 5:12pm

By the way, I think I can explain the change.
It's these lines added to socklib.c.

//look for the end of the icy-header
if (!strstr(buffer, "icy-") && !strstr(buffer,"ice-"))
    continue;

There are some streams which could not be read because
they have \r\n\r\n header ending before the icy
information (then they have another header ending).
But I guess that the above fix was not good.
]]> Fri, 17 Sep 2004 17:12:12 +0000 http://www.stationripper.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=609&PID=2546&title=streamripper-161-is-up#2546 <![CDATA[streamripper 1.61 is up : The period should be ok in windows...]]> http://www.stationripper.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=609&PID=2540&title=streamripper-161-is-up#2540 Author: gregsharp
Subject: 609
Posted: 17 September 2004 at 10:35am

The period should be ok in windows filenames. I strip it from unix because a leading period is used for hidden files.

Do you have a URL for SR_ERROR_NO_HTTP_HEADER?
]]> Fri, 17 Sep 2004 10:35:09 +0000 http://www.stationripper.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=609&PID=2540&title=streamripper-161-is-up#2540 <![CDATA[streamripper 1.61 is up : Two other things - - The period...]]> http://www.stationripper.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=609&PID=2528&title=streamripper-161-is-up#2528 Author: gratajik
Subject: 609
Posted: 16 September 2004 at 8:02pm

Two other things -

- The period symbol isn't included in that function, for windows - was that intended?

- We're seeing a LOT of errors about SR_ERROR_NO_HTTP_HEADER.  Users are reporting that the live version of StationRipper isn't seeing that, but the new one is.  Any ideas?

Thanks,

_Greg

]]> Thu, 16 Sep 2004 20:02:47 +0000 http://www.stationripper.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=609&PID=2528&title=streamripper-161-is-up#2528 <![CDATA[streamripper 1.61 is up : Hehe, just glad I found it. I&#039;ve...]]> http://www.stationripper.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=609&PID=2440&title=streamripper-161-is-up#2440 Author: gratajik
Subject: 609
Posted: 13 September 2004 at 12:08am

Hehe, just glad I found it.  I've been stress testing V2.0 for the last week, and was wonder what was up :P

-Greg

]]> Mon, 13 Sep 2004 00:08:16 +0000 http://www.stationripper.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=609&PID=2440&title=streamripper-161-is-up#2440 <![CDATA[streamripper 1.61 is up : I plead total amnesia on this....]]> http://www.stationripper.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=609&PID=2437&title=streamripper-161-is-up#2437 Author: gregsharp
Subject: 609
Posted: 12 September 2004 at 11:44pm

I plead total amnesia on this. Thanks for the fix!

Greg
]]> Sun, 12 Sep 2004 23:44:22 +0000 http://www.stationripper.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=609&PID=2437&title=streamripper-161-is-up#2437